Regimen
← All work/Law · Analytics & measurement · SEO
Case study

Adelaide Employment Law Firm.


01 · KPI+27%Qualified intake, organic, twelve months
02 · KPI40 piecesUnder one source-piece dashboard
03 · KPIQuarterly PDF → liveReporting cadence to investment
01
The problem

The problem

An Adelaide employment law firm had a content programme that the partners believed was working but couldn't prove. Reporting was a quarterly PDF from a generalist agency, organic intake wasn't tied to source content, and the partner team was about to defund the programme on instinct.


02
The constraint

The constraint

Quarterly PDFs from generalist agencies don't tie content investment to qualified intake — they show traffic, rankings, vanity. The partner team was about to defund the content programme on instinct because the data didn't make the case. Server-side instrumentation, source-piece-to-intake mapping, and a live dashboard surfaced the actual ROI per piece. LPUL and ACCC fair-trading sit alongside the content layer; the measurement gap was the deeper failure mode.


03
The approach

The approach

We instrumented GA4 with a server-side event model, mapped intake to source piece, and rebuilt the technical SEO baseline so the depth would compound rather than leak. Reporting moved from a quarterly PDF to a live dashboard surfacing qualified intake per piece in plain figures.


04
The outcome

The outcome

Qualified intake from organic up 27% across twelve months, with the source-piece dashboard now informing content investment quarterly. Forty practice-area pieces sit under the same measurement model, and the firm has redirected paid spend toward the queries where organic depth pays back fastest.