Regimen
← All work/Cosmetic · Landing pages
Case study

Adelaide Cosmetic Day Surgery.


01 · KPI+22%Page-level conversion, procedure pages
02 · KPI6 pagesUnified layout and policy system
03 · KPI2 proceduresAdded since launch, no rebuild
01
The problem

The problem

An Adelaide cosmetic day-surgery practice had procedure pages that converted unevenly — some held, some leaked. The pages had been built piecemeal over two years and didn't share a layout system, so paid traffic landed on inconsistent funnels.


02
The constraint

The constraint

Procedure pages built piecemeal over years drift in conversion shape and policy treatment. The fix isn't another design tweak — it's a shared conversion-path system where cooling-off, imagery and consent are designed in at layout, not bolted on at sign-off. AHPRA's revised cosmetic guidance is the audit floor; the lift came from treating compliance as a layout constraint, not a publication checklist.


03
The approach

The approach

We rebuilt the procedure-page system as a shared layout with cooling-off and consent designed into the conversion path. Copy was reviewed against the revised standard before any A/B test went live. Tracking was wired in clean so the lift was attributable, not assumed.


04
The outcome

The outcome

Page-level conversion up 22% across the rebuild window, sustained into the next quarter. Six procedure pages now share the same layout and policy footprint, and the system has absorbed two new procedure categories without a rebuild.